Higher Mortality in Patients With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Pre-Existing Arterial Hypertension-Real World Data of the Polish Lymphoma Research Group.

BACKGROUND: Arterial hypertension is mentioned as a risk factor in Cardio-oncology. This study aimed to assess the long-term prognostic value of arterial hypertension (AH) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). METHODS: We analysed data collected by the Polish Lymphoma Research Group for the evaluation of the outcomes associated with the use of first-line rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone therapy in patients with DLBCL with coexisting AH. Patients with other cardiovascular comorbidities or premature chemotherapy discontinuation due to cardiovascular toxicity were excluded. RESULTS: Pre-existing AH was diagnosed in 65 of 232 patients with DLBCL (28%) included in the study, and was associated with significantly shorter overall survival values (p<0.00001). The rates of DLBCL recurrence, administration of second-, third-, or fourth-line chemotherapy, and lymphoma-related deaths were similar in patients with and those without AH. Cardiovascular deaths were significantly more frequently observed in patients with pre-existing AH (38.5% vs 3.6%, p<0.0001). In the univariate analysis, AH (p=0.000001), older age (p<0.000001), and diabetes (p=0.0065) were identified as significant predictors of all-cause mortality; however, cardiovascular mortality was associated with AH (p<0.000001), older age (p=0.000008), and dyslipidaemia (p=0.03). Multivariate analysis revealed AH as an age-independent significant predictor of all-cause (p=0.00045) and cardiovascular mortality (p<0.000001). CONCLUSION: In the long-term follow-up of patients with DLBCL, the role of AH, as an important age-independent predictor of premature cardiovascular mortality, was so strong that it may have value for use in close surveillance in cardio-oncology clinics.

The PD-1- and LAG-3-targeting bispecific molecule tebotelimab in solid tumors and hematologic cancers: a phase 1 trial.

Tebotelimab, a bispecific PD-1×LAG-3 DART molecule that blocks both PD-1 and LAG-3, was investigated for clinical safety and activity in a phase 1 dose-escalation and cohort-expansion clinical trial in patients with solid tumors or hematologic malignancies and disease progression on previous treatment. Primary endpoints were safety and maximum tolerated dose of tebotelimab when administered as a single agent (n = 269) or in combination with the anti-HER2 antibody margetuximab (n = 84). Secondary endpoints included anti-tumor activity. In patients with advanced cancer treated with tebotelimab monotherapy, 68% (184/269) experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs; 22% were grade ≥3). No maximum tolerated dose was defined; the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was 600 mg once every 2 weeks. There were tumor decreases in 34% (59/172) of response-evaluable patients in the dose-escalation cohorts, with objective responses in multiple solid tumor types, including PD-1-refractory disease, and in LAG-3+ non-Hodgkin lymphomas, including CAR-T refractory disease. To enhance potential anti-tumor responses, we tested margetuximab plus tebotelimab. In patients with HER2+ tumors treated with tebotelimab plus margetuximab, 74% (62/84) had TRAEs (17% were grade ≥3). The RP2D was 600 mg once every 3 weeks. The confirmed objective response rate in these patients was 19% (14/72), including responses in patients typically not responsive to anti-HER2/anti-PD-1 combination therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03219268 .

Molnupiravir is effective in patients with haematological malignancies.

Patients with hematologic malignancies are particularly vulnerable to severe infectious complications. SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with a high risk of severe course and death in this patient population. In addition, immune deficits associated with both the blood cancer and the treatment used make vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 less effective than in immunocompetent individuals. Molnupiravir is one of the first oral antiviral drugs to demonstrate a significant benefit in reducing hospitalisation and death in COVID-19 in the general population. In this context, 175 haematology patients with diagnosed COVID-19, and treated with MOL between January and April 2022, came under our scrutiny with a view to defining their clinical characteristics and outcomes. The most common underlying conditions were lymphomas (45%), multiple myelomas (21%) and acute leukaemias or myelodysplastic syndrome (35%). Of all, 77% of the patients were vaccinated, and half of them received a booster. At 28 days after the breakthrough COVID-19 diagnosis, 35 (20%) subjects required hospital admission. Out of those patients, seven (4%) died during the follow-up due to the progression of COVID. Our results corroborate what has been established to date with regard to the positive clinical and safety outcomes of MOL in haematology patients with mild or moderate COVID-19.

Safety of AFM11 in the treatment of patients with B-cell malignancies: findings from two phase 1 studies.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis for patients with relapsed and/or refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) remains poor, with existing treatments having significant side effects. Developed for the treatment of these cancers, AFM11 is a tetravalent, bispecific humanised recombinant antibody construct (TandAb®) designed to bind to human CD19 and CD3 and lead to the activation of T cells inducing apoptosis and killing of malignant B cells. METHODS: Two open-label, multicentre, dose-escalation phase 1 studies evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics and activity of AFM11 in patients with R/R CD19-positive B cell NHL (AFM11-101) and in patients with CD19 + B-precursor Philadelphia-chromosome negative ALL (AFM11-102). Adverse events (AEs) were assessed and recorded; imaging (NHL) or bone marrow assessment (ALL) were used to evaluate response. Additional pharmacodynamic assays undertaken included cytokine release analysis and B-cell and T-cell depletion. RESULTS: In AFM11-101, 16 patients with R/R NHL received AFM11 in five different dose cohorts. Of which, 14 experienced drug-related treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) [including five serious AEs (SAEs)], five patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and ten patients discontinued the study. The high number of neurological events led to a decrease in infusion frequency during the study. No objective response to treatment was observed. In AFM11-102, 17 patients with R/R ALL received AFM11 in six different dose cohorts. Thirteen patients experienced drug-related TEAEs (including four SAEs), DLTs occurred in two patients and five patients discontinued the study. An objective response was recorded in three patients. The maximum tolerated dose could not be determined in either study due to early termination. CONCLUSIONS: AFM11 treatment was associated with frequent neurological adverse reactions that were severe in some patients. In ALL, some signs of activity, albeit short-lived, were observed whereas no activity was observed in patients with NHL; therefore, further clinical development was terminated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02106091 . Safety Study to Assess AFM11 in Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory CD19 Positive B-cell NHL. Registered April 2014. NCT02848911 . Safety Study to Assess AFM11 in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Adult B-precursor ALL. Registered July 2016.

Early efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab with chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with follicular lymphoma: A real-world retrospective report of the Polish Lymphoma Research Group.

BACKGROUND: The first-line obinutuzumab-based immunochemotherapy improves the outcome of patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) compared with rituximab-based regimens. However, infusion-related reactions occur in almost half of patients during the 1st obinutuzumab administration. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to evaluate the early effectiveness and safety of obinutuzumab-based induction regimens in a real-world setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Outcomes of patients diagnosed with FL and treated with obinutuzumab between January 2020 and September 2021 were analyzed. RESULTS: The study group included 143 treatment-naïve patients with FL. The median age was 52 years (range: 28-89 years); 45.1% of patients had a high-risk disease as assessed using the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI). Induction chemotherapy included: O-CVP (obinutuzumab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisolone) in 49.0% of patients, O-CHOP (O-CVP plus doxorubicin) in 28.7% and O-BENDA (obinutuzumab, bendamustine) in 22.4%. Complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) rates were 69.9% and 26.5%, respectively. There was no difference in response rates between different regimens (p = 0.309). Maintenance was started in 115 patients (85.2%). In the 1st cycle, obinutuzumab was administered as a single 1000-milligram infusion in 47.9% of patients, whereas in 52.1%, initial infusions were split over 2 days (100 mg/900 mg). Infusion-related reactions were reported only during the 1st administration of obinutuzumab in 9.1% of patients, with a similar incidence in those receiving the total dose on a single day or split over 2 days (p = 0.458). The most common adverse events were hematological. Five patients died from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). CONCLUSION: The early responses to induction regimens and adverse events profile were similar for every type of induction treatment. The infusion-related reactions were rare and limited to the 1st dose of obinutuzumab.

Bing-Neel Syndrome, a Rare Presentation of Waldenström Macroglobulinemia-A Multicenter Report by the Polish Lymphoma Research Group.

Bing-Neel syndrome (BNS) is a rare presentation of Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM). BNS is a consequence of the central nervous system (CNS) involvement by lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) and, rarely, the peripheral nervous system. The data on BNS are extremely scarce. Therefore, we performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of BNS patients diagnosed and treated in centers aligned with the Polish Lymphoma Research Group. The analysis covers the years 2014-2021. Eleven patients were included, 55% females and the median age at BNS diagnosis was 61 years. The median time from WM to BNS was 3.5 years; 27% of patients did have a diagnosis of WM and BNS made simultaneously or within 30 days from each other. Isolated parenchymal involvement was the least frequent (20%). Patients were treated with different regimens, mostly able to cross the blood-brain barrier, including 18% treated with ibrutinib first line. The cumulative objective response to treatment was 73%. With the median follow-up of 20 months (95% CI, 2-32), the 36-month estimates were: overall survival (OS) 47%, progression-free survival (PFS) 33%, and cumulative incidence of BNS-associated death 41%. The performance status according to ECOG was significant for PFS (HR = 7.79) and the hemoglobin concentration below 11 g/dL was correlated with PFS. To conclude, BNS is a very rare manifestation of WM. It is associated with a poor outcome with most patients succumbing to BNS.

Overall Survival with Brentuximab Vedotin in Stage III or IV Hodgkin's Lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Five-year follow-up in a trial involving patients with previously untreated stage III or IV classic Hodgkin's lymphoma showed long-term progression-free survival benefits with first-line therapy with brentuximab vedotin, a CD30-directed antibody-drug conjugate, plus doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (A+AVD), as compared with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD). A planned interim analysis indicated a potential benefit with regard to overall survival; data from a median of 6 years of follow-up are now available. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive up to six cycles of A+AVD or ABVD. The primary end point, modified progression-free survival, has been reported previously. The key secondary end point was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 664 patients were assigned to receive A+AVD and 670 to receive ABVD. At a median follow-up of 73.0 months, 39 patients in the A+AVD group and 64 in the ABVD group had died (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40 to 0.88; P = 0.009). The 6-year overall survival estimates were 93.9% (95% CI, 91.6 to 95.5) in the A+AVD group and 89.4% (95% CI, 86.6 to 91.7) in the ABVD group. Progression-free survival was longer with A+AVD than with ABVD (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.86). Fewer patients in the A+AVD group than in the ABVD group received subsequent therapy, including transplantation, and fewer second cancers were reported with A+AVD (in 23 vs. 32 patients). Primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was recommended after an increased incidence of febrile neutropenia was observed with A+AVD. More patients had peripheral neuropathy with A+AVD than with ABVD, but most patients in the two groups had resolution or amelioration of the event by the last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received A+AVD for the treatment of stage III or IV Hodgkin's lymphoma had a survival advantage over those who received ABVD. (Funded by Takeda Development Center Americas and Seagen; ECHELON-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01712490; EudraCT number, 2011-005450-60.).

Outcome of SARS-CoV-2-Infected Polish Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

BACKGROUND: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) has become the cause of a worldwide pandemic, and its clinical infection course in patients with hematological malignancies may be severe. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study on 188 chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients (CLL) with COVID-19 infection. RESULTS: At the time of infection 51 patients (27.1%) were treated with Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), 46 (24.5%) with anti-CD20 antibodies while 37 patients (19.7%) received venetoclax. In total, 111 patients (59.0%) required hospitalization and 50 patients (26.5%) died due to COVID-19. Patients with poor performance status (ECOG >1; p = 0.02), advanced age (>65 years; p = 0.04), low hemoglobin concentration (≤10 g/dl; p = 0.0001), low platelets (<100 × 109/L; p = 0.003), and elevated lactate dehydrogenase level (LDH; p = 0.014) had an increased risk of death due to COVID-19. Neither CLL treatment status (treatment naïve vs. treated) nor the type of CLL-directed treatment had impact on the SARS-CoV-2 related risk of death. The multivariate survival analysis showed that advanced age (p = 0.009) and low platelet count (p = 0.0001) were associated with significantly shorter patients' overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 infection in CLL patients is associated with poor outcome regardless of administered CLL-directed treatment.

Older patients (aged ≥60 years) with previously untreated advanced-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma: a detailed analysis from the phase III ECHELON-1 study.

Effective and tolerable treatments are needed for older patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma. We report results for older patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma treated in the large phase III ECHELON-1 study of frontline brentuximab vedotin plus doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (A+AVD) versus doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD). Modified progression-free survival per independent review facility for older versus younger patients (aged ≥60 vs. <60 years) was a pre-specified subgroup analysis; as the ECHELON- 1 study was not powered for these analyses, reported P-values are descriptive. Of 1,334 enrolled patients, 186 (14%) were aged ≥60 years (A+AVD: n=84, ABVD: n=102); results below refer to this age group. Modified progression-free survival per independent review facility was similar in the two arms at 24 months (A+AVD: 70.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 58.4-79.4], ABVD: 71.4% [95% CI: 60.5-79.8], hazard ratio (HR)=1.00 [95% CI: 0.58-1.72], P=0.993). After a median follow-up of 60.9 months, 5-year progression-free survival per investigator was 67.1% with A+AVD versus 61.6% with ABVD (HR=0.820 [95% CI: 0.494-1.362], P=0.443). Comparing A+AVD versus ABVD, grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 18% versus 3%; any-grade febrile neutropenia in 37% versus 17%; and any-grade pulmonary toxicity in 2% versus 13%, respectively, with three (3%) pulmonary toxicity-related deaths in patients receiving ABVD (none in those receiving A+AVD). Altogether, A+AVD showed overall similar efficacy to ABVD with survival rates in both arms comparing favorably to those of prior series in older patients with advanced-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Compared to ABVD, A+AVD was associated with higher rates of neuropathy and neutropenia, but lower rates of pulmonary-related toxicity. Trials registered at ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01712490; EudraCT number: 2011-005450-60.

Brentuximab vedotin with chemotherapy for stage III or IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma (ECHELON-1): 5-year update of an international, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in the treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma with the introduction of PET-adapted regimens, practical challenges prevent more widespread use of these approaches. The ECHELON-1 study assessed the safety and efficacy of front-line A+AVD (brentuximab vedotin, doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) versus ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) in patients with stage III or IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma. The primary analysis showed improved modified progression-free survival with A+AVD. We present an updated analysis of ECHELON-1 at 5 years, an important landmark for this patient population. METHODS: ECHELON-1 was an international, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial done at 218 clinical sites, including hospitals, cancer centres, and community clinics, in 21 countries. Previously untreated patients (≥18 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of ≤2) with stage III or IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive A+AVD (brentuximab vedotin, 1·2 mg/kg of bodyweight, doxorubicin 25 mg/m2 of body surface area, vinblastine 6 mg/m2, and dacarbazine 375 mg/m2) or ABVD (doxorubicin 25 mg/m2, bleomycin 10 U/m2, vinblastine 6 mg/m2, and dacarbazine 375 mg/m2) intravenously on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle for up to six cycles. Stratification factors included region (Americas vs Europe vs Asia) and International Prognostic Score risk group (low, intermediate, or high risk). The primary endpoint was modified progression-free survival; this 5-year update includes analysis of progression-free survival as per investigator assessment in the intention-to-treat population, which was an exploratory endpoint, although the 5-year analysis was not prespecified in the protocol. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01712490) and EudraCT (2011-005450-60), and is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Nov 19, 2012, and Jan 13, 2016, 1334 patients were randomly assigned to receive A+AVD (n=664) or ABVD (n=670). At a median follow-up of 60·9 months (IQR 52·2-67·3), 5-year progression-free survival was 82·2% (95% CI 79·0-85·0) with A+AVD and 75·3% (71·7-78·5) with ABVD (hazard ratio [HR] 0·68 [95% CI 0·53-0·87]; p=0·0017). Among PET-2-negative patients, 5-year progression-free survival was higher with A+AVD than with ABVD (84·9% [95% CI 81·7-87·6] vs 78·9% [75·2-82·1]; HR 0·66 [95% CI 0·50-0·88]; p=0·0035). 5-year progression-free survival for PET-2-positive patients was 60·6% (95% CI 45·0-73·1) with A+AVD versus 45·9% (32·7-58·2) with ABVD (HR 0·70 [95% CI 0·39-1·26]; p=0·23). Peripheral neuropathy continued to improve or resolve over time with both A+AVD (375 [85%] of 443 patients) and ABVD (245 [86%] of 286 patients); more patients had ongoing peripheral neuropathy in the A+AVD group (127 [19%] of 662) than in the ABVD group (59 [9%] of 659). Fewer secondary malignancies were reported with A+AVD (19 [3%] of 662) than with ABVD (29 [4%] of 659). More livebirths were reported in the A+AVD group (n=75) than in the ABVD group (n=50). INTERPRETATION: With 5 years of follow-up, A+AVD showed robust and durable improvement in progression-free survival versus ABVD, regardless of PET-2 status, and a consistent safety profile. On the basis of these findings, A+AVD should be preferred over ABVD for patients with previously untreated stage III or IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma. FUNDING: Millennium Pharmaceuticals (a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company), and Seagen.

Phase I, first-in-human trial of Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor M7583 in patients with B-cell malignancies.

M7583 is a potent, highly selective, covalent BTK inhibitor in development. In this phase I, first-in-human, open label, multicenter dose-escalation trial, M7583 was given at 80 mg (three days)/160 mg (full 28-day cycle), then 300 mg/day, 600 mg/day, 900 mg/day, and 300 mg twice daily to 18 patients (median age 63 years) with refractory/resistant, stage III/IV B-cell malignancies who failed prior therapy (NCT02825836). No dose-limiting toxicities were reported. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurred in 89% of patients, treatment-related AEs in 78%, and treatment-related grade ≥3 AEs in 17%. Common AEs were diarrhea (33%), fatigue (22%), and vomiting (17%). M7583 was rapidly absorbed and exposure was dose-proportional. BTK occupancy was >95% in the 300 mg twice daily and 900 mg/day cohorts. Objective response rate was 50% and disease control rate 78%, supporting a favorable benefit:risk profile. Fasted doses up to 900 mg once daily and 300 mg twice daily were well tolerated and may be tested in future clinical studies.

Tafasitamab for the treatment of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) require further treatment options, especially in cases that cannot tolerate stem cell transplant or cytotoxic chemotherapy. CD19 has emerged as an attractive target in B-cell malignancy and is the subject of several therapeutic strategies. The anti-CD19, humanized, monoclonal antibody tafasitamab (MOR208) has an engineered, modified Fc region with increased affinity for Fcγ receptors, leading to increased cytotoxicity via natural killer cells and macrophages (antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and antibody-dependent cell-mediated phagocytosis) in a promising approach. AREAS COVERED: The development of tafasitamab is reviewed, together with the pharmacokinetics and clinical experience of tafasitamab in R/R DLBCL; clinical data have led to FDA approval and inclusion in NCCN treatment guidelines for tafasitamab in combination with lenalidomide in this indication. EXPERT OPINION: Patients with R/R DLBCL who have failed rituximab-containing regimens may be resistant to CD20-directed therapies; therefore, therapies with an alternative mode of action are of great interest in this setting. Tafasitamab, an anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody, in combination with lenalidomide has demonstrated promising efficacy for patients with R/R DLBCL who are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation. This could provide an alternative approach to classical chemotherapy-based regimens in the relapsed setting.

Acalabrutinib: a highly selective, potent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Inhibiting the activity of Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) prevents the activation of the B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling pathway, which in turn prevents both B-cell activation and BTK-mediated activation of downstream survival pathways. Acalabrutinib is an orally available, highly selective, next-generation inhibitor of BTK. Based on the results of two key phase 3 trials (ELEVATE-TN in patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia [CLL] and ASCEND in patients with relapsed or refractory CLL), which demonstrated superior progression-free survival while maintaining favorable tolerability, acalabrutinib was granted US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 2019 for the treatment of patients with CLL. Acalabrutinib appears to offer similar efficacy but a significantly improved tolerability profile to first-generation agents. Acalabrutinib is a good candidate to combine with other anti-cancer therapies, including B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies, a factor that may help to further improve clinical outcomes in CLL.

Ibrutinib does not have clinically relevant interactions with oral contraceptives or substrates of CYP3A and CYP2B6.

Ibrutinib may inhibit intestinal CYP3A4 and induce CYP2B6 and/or CYP3A. Secondary to potential induction, ibrutinib may reduce the exposure and effectiveness of oral contraceptives (OCs). This phase I study evaluated the effect of ibrutinib on the pharmacokinetics of the CYP2B6 substrate bupropion, CYP3A substrate midazolam, and OCs ethinylestradiol (EE) and levonorgestrel (LN). Female patients (N = 22) with B-cell malignancies received single doses of EE/LN (30/150 µg) and bupropion/midazolam (75/2 mg) during a pretreatment phase on days 1 and 3, respectively (before starting ibrutinib on day 8), and again after ibrutinib 560 mg/day for ≥ 2 weeks. Intestinal CYP3A inhibition was assessed on day 8 (single-dose ibrutinib plus single-dose midazolam). Systemic induction was assessed at steady-state on days 22 (EE/LN plus ibrutinib) and 24 (bupropion/midazolam plus ibrutinib). The geometric mean ratios (GMRs; test/reference) for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) were derived using linear mixed-effects models (90% confidence interval within 80%-125% indicated no interaction). On day 8, the GMR for midazolam exposure with ibrutinib coadministration was ≤ 20% lower than the reference, indicating lack of intestinal CYP3A4 inhibition. At ibrutinib steady-state, the Cmax and AUC of EE were 33% higher than the reference, which was not considered clinically relevant. No substantial changes were noted for LN, midazolam, or bupropion. No unexpected safety findings were observed. A single dose of ibrutinib did not inhibit intestinal CYP3A4, and repeated administration did not induce CYP3A4/2B6, as assessed using EE, LN, midazolam, and bupropion.

Long-term Efficacy of Ibrutinib in Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Results of the Polish Adult Leukemia Study Group Observational Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To study the long-term clinical efficacy and tolerability of ibrutinib monotherapy in real-world relapsed and refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (RR-CLL) patients outside clinical trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical data of 171 RR-CLL patients treated with ibrutinib were collected within the observational study of the Polish Adult Leukemia Study Group. RESULTS: Median patient age was 64 years. Patients were pretreated with 3 (1-10) median lines of therapy, while 42 (24.6%) had 17p deletion. The median observation time was 40 months (range=1-59 months), while median ibrutinib monotherapy reached 37.5 months (range=0.4-59.2 months). Response was noted in 132 (77.2%) patients. The estimated 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 61.1% (95%CI=49.3-70.9%) and 56.8% (95%CI=45.6-66.6%), respectively. At the time of analysis 97 (56.7%) remained under ibrutinib monotherapy. CONCLUSION: Ibrutinib is clinically effective and tolerable as a monotherapy in real-world RR-CLL patients.

Efficacy of high-dose corticosteroid-based treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients with p53 abnormalities in the era of B-cell receptor inhibitors.

PURPOSE: High-dose methylprednisolone (HDMP) with or without anti-CD20 antibody treatment in the pre B-cell receptor inhibitor (BCRi) era was used as potential salvage therapy for relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (r/r CLL/SLL) patients bearing the 17p deletion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Outcomes were compared in retrospect between r/r patients treated with HDMP (n = 20), ibrutinib (n = 39) and idelalisib with rituximab (n = 14). RESULTS: Higher overall response rates were found in those patients undergoing BCRi therapy compared to HDMP (79.2% vs. 0%; p < 0.0001), along with longer median progression-free survival (not reached vs. 24.1 months; p < 0.01). Nevertheless, there were no differences in the overall survival (HDMP 35.87 months vs. not reached; p = 0.58). CONCLUSION: HDMP treatment was significantly inferior in terms of response rate and progression-free survival in r/r CLL/SLL patients with the 17p deletion, and may only be used whenever novel compounds are unavailable.

Different MAF translocations confer similar prognosis in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients.

The MAF translocations, t(14;16) and t(14;20), are considered as adverse prognostic factors based on few studies with small sample sizes. We report on their prognostic impact in a large group of 254 patients - 223 (87.8%) with t(14;16) and 31 (12.2%) with t(14;20). There were no intergroup differences in survival estimates. Median progression-free survival was 16.6 months for t(14;16) and 24.9 months for t(14;20) (p = 0.28). Median overall survival (OS) was 54.0 months and 49.0 months, respectively (p = 0.62). Median OS in patients who underwent double autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was 107.0 months versus 60.0 months in patients who received single ASCT (p < 0.001). ISS 3 was associated with shorter OS (HR = 1.89; 95% CI 1.24-3.19; p = 0.005) in Cox analysis. Our study suggests that t(14;20) should be considered as an adverse factor of equal prognostic implication to t(14;16).